 Regular
Posts: 53
  Location: Madill Ok | zebra - 2/2/2010 4:33 PM firstly, it has to be a corporation with it's main office in the US......secondly, this already takes place in round about ways anyway....i tend to agree with the ruling and also think it won't make much difference in our elections.....
i'm actually hoping this drives congress to enact more meaningful campaign reform althoug i flip flop as to how to do that.....i think immediate transparency of both campaign contributions by anyone donating as well as detailed information about anyone or any group involved in political advertising would be a good thing....i think corporation will have to tread lightly regardless as consumers may change their spending habits depending on what positions or candidates they support
we have heard them say "no that wont happen" has to be a u.s. company... has anyone seen this in writing personally?? They are liars and say anything to apease, just like they wont keep us from seeing our doctors... proven a lie today... Obama said "oh, someone snuck that into the bill" Someone?? well who is someone??? If the lips are moving, he is lying. He knows what they are doing, and then he lies and blames others. |